Bot Prize

I Tried Wyvern AI for a Month: What Worked, What Didn’t

Written by

in

This is a fictional first-person review.

You know what? I didn’t expect to like Wyvern AI as much as I did. I went in with low hopes. Another smart helper that says it can do everything. But it surprised me. Not every day. Not every task. Still, it stuck.

If you want to glimpse the grand, revenue-boosting pitch behind the tool, the founders spell it out in their Y Combinator launch post, and for a nuts-and-bolts breakdown of features there’s a handy summary in the official Wyvern docs.

Let me explain.

The quick take

  • Great for drafting, planning, and quick “think with me” work.
  • Clumsy with facts when the question is fuzzy.
  • Friendly tone control. Rough edges with voice.
  • Good for busy folks who need a fast first draft.

I’ll show you what I did with it—real tasks, messy context, and all.

Getting set up (and a tiny hiccup)

Signing up was easy. Email, code, done. The first screen asked what I do. I picked “content,” “home,” and “light coding.” Cute little icons, which I didn’t need, but, okay.

One hiccup: the help bubble hid the “Continue” button on my phone. I had to rotate the screen. Small thing, but I did huff.

What I used it for, for real

1) PTA email that didn’t sound stiff

I had to send a note about our school bake sale. I pasted my messy notes and said:

“Make this a friendly email. Keep it short. Make sure parents know pickup is Friday at 3.”

Wyvern’s draft:

“Hi everyone—Quick reminder: our bake sale pickup is Friday at 3:00 by the gym doors. If you signed up to bake, thank you. If you can’t make it, reply and we’ll hold your box. Cash or card works. See you there!”

I changed “by the gym doors” to “at the main gate.” Done in two minutes. No fuss.

(If staring at a blank message is more your issue, my experiment with Swipey AI shows how a specialised opener generator can unfreeze that first line.)

2) A tiny script to fix my photo names

I had a folder of kid photos with wild names like IMG_9237.JPG. I asked:

“Give me a simple Python script that renames files like IMG_9237.JPG to 2024-FieldDay-001.jpg.”

It gave me this, and it worked on my laptop:

import os

folder = "photos"
prefix = "2024-FieldDay-"
count = 1

for name in sorted(os.listdir(folder)):
    if name.lower().endswith((".jpg", ".jpeg", ".png")):
        new_name = f"{prefix}{count:03}.jpg"
        os.rename(os.path.join(folder, name),
                  os.path.join(folder, new_name))
        count += 1

I liked that it warned me to test on a copy first. That felt caring.

3) Weeknight meals from random pantry stuff

I told it what I had: “pasta, canned tomatoes, frozen corn, eggs, spinach, chicken thighs.” Then I said, “Five dinner ideas. 30 minutes each.”

It gave:

  • One-pot tomato pasta with spinach
  • Corn and chicken taco bowls (lime optional)
  • Baked chicken thighs with garlic and a quick spinach salad
  • Tomato egg scramble on toast (breakfast for dinner)
  • Pasta with crispy corn and chili flakes

I made the taco bowls that night. It even gave a quick sauce: “mix yogurt, lime, salt.” No lime here, but I used a splash of vinegar. Close enough.

4) Summarizing a long PDF without fluff

I dropped a 19-page field trip policy PDF and asked:

“Give me 5 bullet points. Be plain. No legal words.”

It came back with:

  • Kids need signed forms for every trip.
  • Adults need background checks.
  • You can bring nut-free snacks only.
  • Buses leave on time; come 10 minutes early.
  • If weather is bad, you’ll get a text.

Was it perfect? Maybe not. But it was clear and fast, and I could skim the full PDF after.

5) Instagram caption that didn’t sound cringey

I run a tiny cookie shop from home. I asked:

“Write a short caption for chewy chocolate chip cookies. Warm tone. Sunday mood. 2 simple tags.”

It wrote:

“Warm tray. Soft centers. Little sea salt on top. Stop by before they vanish. #cookies #sunday”

Short. Not syrupy. People commented, “Save me two.” That’s the goal.

Stuff I loved

  • Tone slider: I could nudge it from “formal” to “playful.” Felt like a dimmer switch for voice.
  • Memory (light touch): It remembered my shop name but didn’t cling to old details. If I said, “Forget that,” it did.
  • File chat: I dragged in a PDF, a CSV, even a screenshot. Asking, “What’s wrong here?” saved me time.
  • Snappy drafts: First drafts landed in seconds most of the day. It slowed a bit late afternoon.

Where it stumbled

  • Facts got fuzzy: I asked for last week’s local football score. It guessed. Confident, but wrong. If you need facts, ask it to cite or tell it to say “I’m not sure.” That helps.
  • Voice felt robotic: The voice setting sounded like a nice robot. Not bad. Not human either. I used text, mostly.
  • Rewriting too tidy: Sometimes it cleaned my writing so much it washed out my style. I had to say, “Keep my short, punchy voice.”
  • Busy-hour lag: Around 5 p.m., it took 10–15 seconds to answer. Not awful. Still, I noticed.
  • Clear limits: Long tables made it groan. I had to paste smaller chunks or ask for a column at a time.

A tiny tangent on trust

I didn’t share client docs. Call me cautious. I asked it, “Don’t save this chat,” and it said it wouldn’t store. Still, I treated it like a helper, not a vault. If you handle private stuff, you should too.

If you ever want to see how researchers test whether conversational software can pass for human, check out the BotPrize competition.

Who should use it?

  • Students who need clean summaries and simple study guides.
  • Solo founders who need quick copy, light code, and planning.
  • Busy parents who want meal ideas, emails, and lists without stress.

By the way, if you’re a tired parent who’d like a little adult-only downtime once the chores are done, you might enjoy exploring this local MILF dating hub where you can discreetly connect with like-minded moms nearby and skip the endless swipe grind of the big mainstream apps.

If you’d rather meet potential matches in person and skip the back-and-forth texting altogether, consider checking out a local event calendar such as the one for speed dating in Belleville where you can see upcoming sessions, reserve a seat, and get practical tips on how to make those five-minute conversations count.

If you’re curious how a more academic-focused assistant stacks up, you can read my deep-dive into Cheater AI for a point-by-point comparison.

Who might skip it? Folks who need strict facts on demand, like real-time scores or prices. It tries, but it can get cute with guesses.

Tips that made it better for me

  • Set the tone first: “You are my quick editor. Keep sentences short. Keep my voice.” It works.
  • Add guardrails: “If you don’t know, say so.” It stops the guess game.
  • Show a sample: Paste one paragraph you like. Say, “Match this.” It nails the vibe.
  • Ask for steps: “Give me steps first, code second.” Fewer mistakes.
  • Use “check yourself”: “List what you’re unsure about in this draft.” It will point out weak spots.

My verdict

Wyvern AI became my fast first-draft buddy. It didn’t replace my brain. It sped up the boring parts—emails, captions, little scripts, meal plans. When I asked clear, narrow questions, it shined. When I asked for vague facts, it stumbled.

Would I keep it? Yes—for planning, drafting, and tinkering. Not for hard facts. I’d call it an 8 out of 10 on helpful days, a 6 when it gets cheeky with guesses.

One last thing: if you try it, start small. Give it one job, like “clean up this email.” See how it listens. Tools don’t have to be perfect to be worth it. They just have to save you time without getting in your way. This one mostly did.

More posts