Human-like Bots at WCCI 2012

A Human-like bots competition was held at the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation in Brisbane. The results are below.

The teams

Team Affiliation Members
ICE-WCCI2012 Ritsumeikan University, Japan
Seiji Murakami
Takumi Sato
Naoki Kusumoto
Kenta Tsuji
Takahiro Yamamoto
Ruck Thawonmas
UT^2 University of Texas at Austin
Jacob Schrum
Igor Karpov
Risto Miikkulainen
AMISBot Charles University, Prague
Jan Dufek
David Holañ
Rudolf Kadlec
Jakub Gemrot
Michal Bída

Humanness results

Most human bots

bot name humanness %
UT^2 21.0526 %
AMISBot 17.6471 %
ICE-WCCI2012 7.6923 %

Most human humans

player name humanness %
Craig Speelman 40.0000 %
Chris Holme 21.4286 %
John Weise 11.1111 %
Samaneh Rastegari 9.0909 %

Most human epic bots

skill level humanness %
1 33.3333 %
4 28.5714 %
2 11.1111 %
3 0.0000 %

Judging results

Best bot judges

bot name accuracy %
UT^2 53.8462 %
HumanLikeBot 51.2195 %
ICE-WCCI2012 40.0000 %

Best human judges

human name accuracy %
John Weise 63.4146 %
Chris Holme 61.9048 %
Samaneh Rastegari 56.8182 %
Craig Speelman 50.0000 %

Human-like Bots at CEC 2011

A Human-like bots competition was held at the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation in New Orleans. The results are below.

The teams

Team Affiliation Members
Conscious Robots Carlos III University of Madrid
Raul Arrabales
Jorge Muñoz
ICE-CEC2011 Ritsumeikan University, Japan
Seiji Murakami
Takumi Sato
Akihiro Kojima
Daichi Hirono
Naoki Kusumoto
Ruck Thawonmas
UT^2 University of Texas at Austin
Jackob Schrum
Igor Karpov
Risto Miikkulainen
Knightbot University of Central Florida
Gita Sukthankar
Bulent Tastan

Humanness results

Most human bots

bot name humanness %
Conscious-Robots 30.0000 %
ICE-CEC2011 26.3158 %
UT^2 10.5263 %
Knightbot 10.0000 %

Most human humans

player name humanness %
Martin Masek 88.2353 %
Daniel Beard 84.6154 %
Philip Hingston 68.7500 %
Geoff Hingston 52.9412 %

Judging results

Best bot judges

bot name accuracy %
UT^2 91.6667 %
Conscious-Robots 50.0000 %
ICE-CEC2011 38.4615 %

Best human judges

human name accuracy %
Daniel Beard 84.2105 %
Geoff Hingston 84.2105 %
Martin Masek 68.0851 %
Philip Hingston 56.0000 %